parker.mov / editologica

concept philosophy ◆ emerging

Contested Mediality

he ongoing negotiation and conflict over a medium's specific properties, standards, and 'correct' usage. In editing, this manifests as a struggle between established commercial standards (like the 16:9 horizontal frame) and aesthetic experiments or new technologies (like vertical video) that challenge those norms. The editor often works at the flashpoint of this conflict, either reinforcing standards or deliberately breaking them for artistic effect. The tension between vertical and horizontal aspect ratios serves as a prime example of contested mediality. It demonstrates how media standards are not inherent properties but are constantly negotiated between commercial pressures (e.g., broadcast standards), technological affordances (e.g., smartphone orientation), and artistic experimentation (e.g., video art). This can manifest as 'cinematic graffiti,' where collectives like Racer Trash rework existing films without permission, asserting a transformative, non-profit use right that challenges traditional copyright and authorship.

notes

Racer Trash's use of Twitch for live premieres of their reworked films is a direct challenge to cinematic distribution norms. By claiming their work is transformative and non-profit, they operate in a legal and creative grey area, explicitly contesting the 'rules' of the medium.

visual examples

  • The proliferation of vertical video on social media (2010s-Present) — The format's rise, driven by smartphone use, directly challenges the horizontal standard of traditional film and television, creating ongoing controversies and technical workarounds like pillarboxing.

related · 6